The New Testament Essay Example for Free

The forward-looking Testament EssayThe New Testament is deeply rooted in what Friedrich Nietzsche called slave morality. Its sense of ethics and the social value it expounds lowlife be described as a downward pull towards a constant affirmation of a shameful compassionate. One can see the New Testament as copying the ideals of the Old Testament, for the full(a) Judeo-Christian message is simply, echoing Mikhail Bakunin God is everything, humanity is nothing God is the master, humanity its slaves. As such, ethics, values and virtues that sprang from the New Testament is and will always be that of a slave race. Knowing that saviour himself was exceedingly influenced by Judaic tradition, one can say that the New Testament is merely a lengthening of the Old Testament. The honorable atmosphere of the classical civilizations of Greece and Rome were different from that of the Judeo-Christian one. The Greeks and the roman types were far more dictatorial in their outlook of life a nd their civilizations were a mish-mash of what Nietzsche referred to as Apollonian and Dionysian elements. Whereas the Judeo-Christian God rules and controls all, the Greeks and Romans were able to bring into being a system where Fate controls all including the divinity fudges and goddesses themselves.Unlike the Hebrew and Christian slave, the Greek human is not a product of his God provided of his passion, his capacity to reason, and his past. There whitethorn be gods and goddesses, but they exist as part of a hierarchy in nature. When a man fears a god, it was because of that gods power (and there were many a variants of such powers). A man therefore fears god because he saw god as a superior but this does not mean that he saw god as a master. On the contrary, a Greek or a Roman may imagine himself powerful enough to challenge the gods.The gods were feared because of their powers and not in the Christian sense when populate fear God in fear of a brutal punishment in the afte rlife. Thus, the Greco-Roman ethical atmosphere promotes what Nietzsche called master morality. What was valued more was the capacity of human beings to rise up towards the level of a god (like Homers Achilles) and not how much one has knelt before a God. There may be a noble acceptance that the actions of the gods were considered fate (as in Virgils Aenied), human actions still instruct whether this or that human becomes a master or a god.What is similar between the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian the sense of ethics and sets of values and virtues is their obsession for what is ideal. Greco-Roman values are based on the philosophy of a form and marrow, where the form may suffer changes but its substance remain permanent. Changes may ruin the form but the substance never perishes. Platos cave demonstrates this duality in reality. In the Judeo-Christian sense too resides this duality body and soul. The body may perish but the soul does not. taking care of the soul is therefore fi rst priority of Judeo-Christian morality while deciphering and understanding the substance is the first priority of Greco-Roman philosophy. This difference is highlighted by the fact that deliverymans taught his wisdom by means of verbal parables concentrating on morality, Homer and Virgil through their written vulgar display of the human senses in its shin against godly intuitions, while Plato in his philosophical tracts that promoted a certain degree of idealism.This difference between delivery boy and the classical writers can also be attributed to their audiences slave morality for Jesus, master morality for the classical writers. Thus, Jesus himself was continuing a tradition deep into the world of the Old Testament slaves and in fashioning himself as the Jewish messiah his teachings were meant to salvage his world the same way as Moses salvaged his. The decadence of Jewish partnership during the time of Jesus was reminiscent of the Hebrew society before Moses came down wi th the two tablets in his hands.Jewish society had become a corruption of its former radiance and the teachings of the Christ was supposed to clean away(p) such corruptions. Whereas Homer, Plato and Virgil wrote in attempt to expose the human spirit in its pure and real substance, Jesus spoke of that spirits final destination. The New Testament, in this sense, failed to realize that most of the time the travel of the human spirit is more important than its destination.