'A day without a mexican Essay\r'

'With the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo on February 2, 1848, the bank dividing the Mexican people was throwed. The Mexican allowance direction various things to incompatible people. To date, 600 miles of circumvent protect has already been built. This wall would extend from California, to El Paso, to the valley. The first-class honours degree conclude given by the presidential term for eccentric of the wall was to prevent terrorist attacks, the next was to hang in felonious Mexicans out, and the most current hotshot is to combat the medicate smuggling into the joined States.\r\nFor some Mexicans and Mexican Americans, the strand induces threats, and for others, it establishes possibilities for angiotensin converting enzymeself and one’s family. The molding industrialization program, which began the 1970s, increase significantly from its previous conditions. Migration to smother townships became super prevalent. peal cities led to race gai n and, simultaneously, high unemployment rates. In reaction, government officials started the maquilladora program. Maquillas (from the Spanish maquillar, ‘to make up’) be the colossus sweatshops of the global economy, where armies of poor women ar ramble to work to assemble wides for export.\r\nSee to a not bad(p)er extent: Unemployment †problems and solutions essay\r\nThe supply of women is so great that these women atomic number 18 treated with no value. perimeter industrialization began to rise and power companies such(prenominal) as Samsung and RCA, as evident in the movie, Maquilapolis (2006) by Vicky Funari and Sergio de la Torre, by unendingly having lines of women ready and leave behinding to work. Mexican government officials viewed the Maquiladora Program in a confirming light, cl sharpening it to be â€Å"an integral part of Mexico’s strategy for development. ”[1] The movie depicts the maquiladora workers in Tijuana, Mexico to equalizer life working in these factories with their clamber for justice in the system that governs their prep ar of work.\r\nThis reiterates how machismo affected gender relations in Mexico and how woman are devalued. These maquiladoras are good because of the labor they give to Mexican citizens. However, it’s not fair for the low fight and cruelties taken on by the employees in these factories. Unsanitary and dangerous pulverization conditions pose threats to these women’s pass aways each day. The women are look for the means of life and survival. They face dead times, so they are passd to stick jobs in labor. Despite the conditions these women drive home been subjected to, they so far continue to remain try forful.\r\nSenorita Extraviada (2001) is a documentary film by Lourdes Portillo about the hundreds of unsolved murders of three-year-old women that progress to occurred over the past 10 years in Juarez, Mexicoâ€the Mexican border city across the Rio Grande from El Paso. The compaction of non-government organizations (NGOs) for Women (1994-2000) was created by female activists; their main aim behind the densification was to change the cultural, economic, and policy-making context of gendered fierceness in the city. This coalition organized events such as marches, put forward conferences, and domestic and international press was prevalent.\r\n there were umteen challenges against this coalition: it was the city’s first ever cross-class women’s governmental organization and the city’s first feminist-oriented political coalition. An external attack began to form on the Coalition. some(prenominal) â€Å"elite” political and economic leaders argued that the violence was â€Å" normal” for Juarez. They argued that many of these women k bran-new what they were doingâ€living the â€Å"doble vida” (double life) as factory workers during the day and prostitutes by night. Many take a firm stand it was a recycled discourse of female trouble.\r\nThe intuitive feeling of these â€Å"public women” mimicked the negative talk contact the prostitutes as women who â€Å"contaminated” all associated with her from family, community, and nation. A â€Å"public woman” was regarded as an love child citizen. Government authorities used this as a way to dismiss the influx of crimes and blame the women for the surge of violence in Juarez. Alejandro Lugo presents an analysis of the social dimensions along the border from glossary hierarchies to the notions of borderlands.\r\nHe suggests that border crossings are â€Å"constituted by ‘inspection post’ which inspect, monitor, and survey what goes in and out in the name of class, race, and nation. ”[2] He asserts that the term ‘border crossings’ has be fall down an exceedingly hopeful phrase. Lugo tho claims that people are, indeed, afraid to cross these borders. on that point are a few reasons for that. Those who have legal residence in the U. S. , who are light-skinned, and those who speak English, cross borders without much concern.\r\nHowever, those are not American citizens, who are dark-skinned, and who founding father’t speak English face tough circumstances. As Lugo suggests, â€Å"while borderlands implies eightfold sides, ‘border’ implies deuce sides. ”[3] The division among the United States and Mexico is ever-present, separating those who are residents and those who aspire to live the American dream to better themselves and their family. frenzy is being exercised against Mexicans at border crossings. The clay sculpture Patrol continues to isolate those who do not have legal residence and force these Mexicans cover to where they supposedly ‘ extend.\r\n’ There is no in-between. As described by Lugo, many Border Patrol agents possess no acceptance for uncertainty. You must prove you belong or you’re strained back to the other side. This border symbolizes such autocratic things for many hopefuls seeking freedom, work, opportunity, however, at the homogeneous time, is a complete, unwelcoming division. Color hierarchies exhibit this secernment against many dark-skinned Mexicans who are forced out of the U. S. by their own Mexican American people along the border. The border transforms itself.\r\nAs evident of this border variety is the dose smuggling. In a upstart article, â€Å"Drug smugglers from Mexico move into NM town,” the border town of capital of Ohio, NM has seen an influx of send off cars with nice rims and a boom in the housing market. Many of these drug smugglers have fled from Palomas, Mexico where the Mexican army had previously been stationed. check to some residents, such as maria Gutierrez, â€Å"The problem is in Palomas. It’s imperturbable here”[4] Many have refused to come to terms that crime is starting to pelte r their town.\r\nThis also alludes to the border transformationâ€not just a sign of hope to those who seek to cross it, only, now, a means of making big money for some. The Columbus police department has faced its conduct of â€Å"bad” cops inwardly the force, yet the new appointment of police chief, Angelo Vega, is meant to restructure things within the town. However, even some residents believe that it would be impossible for this town to survive without illegal money flowing in. not lone(prenominal) is violence witnessed between Mexicans and Mexican Americans, but also amongst Caucasians.\r\nRacial injustice continues to make it to this day. Similar to the story of Esequiel Hernandez, the 18-year-old U. S. high naturalise student killed on May 20, 1997 by Marines along the USâ€Mexico border in Redford, Texas, Luis Ramirez was recently murdered by two Anglo males in Pennsylvania. Ramirez, a 25-year-old illegal Mexican immigrant, was assaulted by â€Å"a gang of intoxicated white teenagers motivated by a dislike of the growing Hispanic population in their small coal town of Shenandoah. ”[5] Both the Marines and the two men charge of this crime were acquitted of all charges.\r\nThese types of racial tensions exhibit the racial hierarchies in society. Many guilty people can be set free just because of the color of their skin. In contrast, the story of the maquilladora program, the surge of violence along the border, gender relations, the influx of drug trading, and prevalence of racial tensions and color hierarchies amongst Mexicans and Mexican Americans all illustrate the dangers that face the border. These combinations of problems all make up the transformation of the border within the past several decades. It real depicts the war of the frontiers.\r\nMany residents along the border, as in the town of Columbus are fighting to keep their town as it was by trying to rid the drug trafficking. Many Mexican Americans want a better life for their family, as good as, to not be treated inferiorly by their own people because of the color of their skin. As put by Salman Rushdie, â€Å"By crossing those frontiers, conquering those terrors and reaching their goal, they themselves were now what they were feeling for. They had become the god they sought. ”[6] For many this â€Å"god,” is the crossing at the border.\r\nFor some, it leads to a life make full with promises and opportunities, and for others, false hopes and empty promises at their mother country are ever changing. The war of frontiers will continue to exist until the government does more(prenominal) to change how things are run along the controversial border. â€â€â€â€â€â€â€â€ [1] Maria Patricia Fernandez-Kelly, â€Å"Chapter 2,” in For We are Sold, I and My People: Women and Industry in Mexico’s Frontier, (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1983), 35. [2] Alejandro Lugo, â€Å"Theorizing Borde r inspections,” Cultural Dynamics 12:3 (2000), 355. [3] Lugo, 359.\r\n[4] Alicia Caldwell, ” Drug smugglers from Mexico move into NM town,” capital of Texas American-Statesman, May 1, 2009, http://www. statesman. com/search/content/shared-gen/ap/ subject/US_Drug_Smugglers_Town. html, accessed on May 1, 2009. [5] Michael Rubinkam, ” Luis Ramirez Killers Found Not Guilty After Beating Mexican Immigrant To Death,” Huffington Post, May 2, 2009, http://www. huffingtonpost. com/2009/05/04/luis-ramirez-killers-foun_n_195535. html, accessed on May 4, 2009. [6] Salman Rushdie, â€Å" grade across This Line,” in Step Across This Line: Collected Nonfiction, 1992-2002, (New York: The Modern Library, 2002), 351.\r\n'